The undetectable = untransmittable (U = U) campaign was launched in 2016. It simply states that if an HIV-positive person is on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and has undetectable viral levels, they cannot sexually transmit the virus to others. The evidence for this statement is irrefutable and has been heralded in publications such as ‘U = U taking off in 2017’ (Lancet HIV 2017;4:e475) and now reiterated in JAMA (Eisinger et al. JAMA 2019;321:451–2). Both articles record the science – biomedical, behavioural and social – that underpins the attitudinal shifts that accompany the journals’ declarations. These findings will: The principles of U = U are: In South Africa, which has more HIV-positive citizens than any other country, the acceptance by the international community of U = U is wonderful news. It gives renewed hope in a country reeling from an ongoing epidemic and much in need of encouraging news regarding HIV. Also of interest to the 3 million South African women of childbearing age in the country who are HIV positive are the results of a modelling study that weighs up the risks of two antiretroviral drugs. Efavirenz (EFV) and dolutegravir (DTG) are amongst the most popular ART medications but there have been concerns about the teratogenic effects of DTG, which is the more effective in preventing HIV transmission and avoiding deaths from AIDS. This creates a dilemma for women wanting protection without danger, should they conceive (Hoffman and Mofenson Ann Intern Med 2019;170:658–659). The new calculations suggest that DTG will prove superior to EFV in terms of lives saved and transmissions avoided. This gives clinicians clear direction about how to advise young women despite the risk of neural tube defects to their offspring (Dugdale et al. Ann Intern Med 2019;170:614–25). Postmenopausal women who take hormone therapy are at greater risk of uterine prolapse than those not taking hormones. This appears to be the conclusion of a report from Finland where women having surgery for prolapse were investigated for their use of hormones and compared with women not having surgery (Rahkola-Soisalo et al. Menopause 2019;26:140–144). In this study, one-third (34%) of women undergoing surgical uterine removal for prolapse used menopausal hormone therapy. One-quarter (27%) of Finnish women in the general population (the control group) used hormones. For clarity: The authors of the study found this elevation of risk to be consistent, irrespective of the type of estrogen used or the type of accompanying progesterone prescribed. This included levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices that give rise to very low levels of circulating progestins, leading to the conclusion that estrogens were responsible for the tendency to prolapse and the resultant need for repair surgery through their effects on collagen, metalloproteins, elastin, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts in the pelvic floor. There is ongoing debate about when pregnancies that continue ‘past term’ should be delivered. Those that have co-morbidities are less contentious and require individual decision-making that take ‘non-chronological’ factors into account but pregnancies that are uncomplicated also deserve personal and shared discussion as to when induction of labour is indicated. Two recent publications add data to assist with clinical considerations. A trial in the Netherlands randomised low-risk women to either be induced at 41 weeks or 42 weeks should the pregnancy continue that far (Keulen et al. BMJ 2019;364:l344). The investigators had to approach 6000 women to recruit the 1800 needed for the study, which suggests that women have strongly held views about chronologically dictated induction, both for and against it. In the event, those allocated to be induced at 41 weeks were duly delivered as scheduled but many of those allocated to expectant management for the next week went into spontaneous labour. Ultimately the groups only differed in their median gestational age at delivery by 2 days. The results were that induction or waiting were similar for most of the outcomes, namely perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidity and maternal morbidity. There was a 1.4% increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in the expectant management cohort (3.1% versus 1.7%). An editorial commenting on the trial suggests the interpretation of the findings ‘should be viewed with caution’ and that they are ‘not sufficiently conclusive’ to change current practice (Kenyon et al. BMJ 2019;364:l681). Observational research from the USA provides information on large numbers of pregnancies of low-risk women having their first child (Chen et al. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:729–37). Using datasets from 2010 onwards, the authors looked at the composite neonatal morbidity of over 3 million births at 39, 40 or 41 weeks of gestation. Taking 39-week deliveries as their baseline, they calculated neonatal morbidity risk ratios increased at 40 weeks to 1.22 (95% CI 1.19–1.25) and at 41 weeks to 1.53 (95% CI 1.49–1.58). Composite maternal morbidity also rose with later delivery and by similar risk ratios. The authors describe these increases as modest (Figure 1). Source: Chen et al. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:729–37. Decisions to induce labour for reasons of gestational age carry implications for the mother, fetus, family, community and the allocation of resources. Induction policies, be they institutional or individual must be shared between the woman, her partner and those in charge of her care because of their impact on her experience of childbirth. With induction rates rising in countries with high socio-economic status (reaching 35% of nulliparous women in the UK), this aspect of obstetric care needs to be given wise thought as a widely used intervention that is based on policy is not personalised medicine. An article from Australia published in a sports journal poses the question of whether breast size affects how women participate in physical activity (Coltman et al. J Sci Med Sport 2019;22:324–29). It appears that it does, since the researchers found that if they divided volunteers’ breast sizes into small, medium, large and hypertrophic, there was a correlation between 3D scan breast volume and women's reported exercise history. The larger their breasts, the less their participation in vigorous-intensity physical activity. There was also an association between breast size and body mass index with more than 90% of women with large or hypertrophic breasts being overweight or obese. Those with larger breasts considered breast size to be an impediment to regular exercise, thus inhibiting their participation in activities that carry health benefits. Women face barriers of time, environment, safety and self-consciousness when reporting they cannot exercise and now it seems attention to breast size should be addressed when encouraging fitness through exercise. The issue encapsulates how one sustains health protective behaviours such as physical activity and healthy eating (Dunton JAMA 2018;320:639–40). Engaging with pro-active behaviours involves situational cues such as location, social context, mood, self-esteem plus family and collegial encouragement. Being sensitive to breast size and offering advice on garments, privacy for exercising and support groups may help. This field manual, produced by the various United Nations agencies and non-governmental organisations that make up the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG), is aimed at sexual and reproductive health co-ordinators and programme managers working in humanitarian settings. The manual provides evidence and practical examples regarding the application and adaptation of global sexual and reproductive health (SRH) or human rights standards in humanitarian settings. Chapter 2 outlines the fundamental principles of SRH programming in humanitarian settings including: work in respectful partnership, advance human rights and reproductive rights through sexual and reproductive health programming, ensure technical soundness, human rights and financial accountability, and share information and results. Chapter 3 discusses the humanitarian response to SRH needs at the onset of an emergency and outlines the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for SRH, which is regarded as the minimum standard of care to be provided in humanitarian response. Comprehensive guidance, including at both community and health-service levels, is provided on contraception, abortion care, maternal and newborn health, gender-based violence, HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Practical programmatic examples are presented as are links to further reading and additional resources. This 2018 edition of the manual promotes the wider application of the guidance beyond refugee situations for the first time, to additionally include conflict zones and natural disasters. This high-impact practice brief focuses on promoting the engagement and mobilisation of communities in group dialogue and action to promote healthy sexual relationships, a finding that emerged from research investigating community group engagement (CGE) interventions to encourage healthy SRH behaviours. The CGE activities included mapping exercises, social network approaches, exploratory games, dramas, case studies, prioritisation exercises and coalition-building. The briefing discusses barriers, family and social changes and individual changes that can lead to changes in SRH behaviours. In terms of impact it is reported that community group engagement can improve both men's and women's SRH knowledge, improve women's decision-making power, influence change at the community, family and individual levels by building capacity within the community and that it is associated with higher levels of contraceptive use. A specific example is provided from Uganda and a number of implementation experience pointers are outlined. Three priority questions for future research are also highlighted with the technical advisory group recommending that CGE interventions be more thoroughly researched and evaluated to assess the potential impact. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published updated guidelines on the prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus, superseding the interim guidelines published in September 2016. The updated guidelines are based on the growing amount of data and research evidence in the period since September 2016 and are aimed at policy makers and healthcare professionals. Recommendations focus on three main areas: individuals living in areas with ongoing transmission of Zika virus, individuals living in areas without ongoing transmission of Zika virus travelling to or from areas with ongoing Zika virus transmission and recommendations about safer sex. Specific guidance is provided for women or couples planning to conceive or having sex that could result in conception and for pregnant women and their sexual partners. The Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs has developed a new online resource aimed at health professionals looking after patients with HIV, family planning programme managers, advocates and journalists. The Results4informedchoice website was developed in response to previous research that indicated that women using progestogen-only injectable contraceptive methods may be at a higher risk of acquiring HIV and in response to the initiation of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which began in 2015. The ECHO trial is investigating the comparative risk of HIV acquisition among women using one of three contraceptive methods: depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (injectable), levonorgestrel-releasing (LNG) implants and copper intrauterine devices (IUDs). The ECHO trial results are due to be published in July 2019. The website provides access to resources and tools to help professionals to counsel women and ensure they have all the information required to make an informed contraceptive choice. The resource library provides links to the ECHO trial publications, programme reports and research presentations. Key HIV and contraception data is provided for individual countries and communications materials for the media. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) The following guidelines are now available at www.jogc.com No. 378-Placentophagy No. 379-Attendance at and Resources for Delivery of Optimal Maternity Care Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) The following guidelines are now available at www.ranzcog.edu.au Updated Guidance on Abortion, College Statement, Abortion (C-Gyn 17) Updated Guidance on Abortion, College Statement, Use of Mifepristone for medical abortion (C-Gyn 21) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) The following guideline is now available at www.acog.org Practice Advisory: Management of Pregnant and Reproductive-Aged Women during a Measles Outbreak Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) The following guideline is now available at www.fsrh.org FSRH Clinical Guideline: Overweight, Obesity and Contraception Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine (SMFM) The following guideline is now available at www.smfm.org SMFM Consult Series #48: Immediate Postpartum Long-acting Reversible Contraception for Women at High Risk for Medical Complications EP3466371 (A1) Neovaginal prosthesis. This patent application relates to the development of a prosthesis for temporary insertion between the bladder and rectum in a person who has undergone vaginoplasty to create a vagina or neovagina. The prosthesis has been specifically designed to avoid the need for skin grafts from the patient and involves only the prosthesis with an additional coating of biocompatible and biodegradable mesh. Acien AP, Oliva MMA, Sanchez LM, Martinez GJ, Acien Sanchez MI. 10 April 2019. WO2019060882 (A1) System for supporting clinical decision-making in reproductive endocrinology and infertility. This patent application discusses development of a computer system providing clinical decision-making support regarding patient treatment during ovarian stimulation cycles. The inventors state that the system aims to aid decision-making to ensure the highest likelihood of pregnancy whilst accounting for patient well-being, alternative approaches and the risks associated with infertility treatment. This application claims the benefit of US Provisional Application No. 62/562994, filed 25 September 2017. Letterie G, MacDonald A. 28 March 2019. US2019094229 (A1) Methods of diagnosing, classifying and treating endometrial cancer and precancer. This patent application proposes methods and kits for the detection, classification and treatment of endometrial cancer. Specifically, this involves the detection of a receptor mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in a biological sample containing endometrial cells, where the mutation is associated with FGFR2 receptor activation. The presence of one or more activation mutations in the FGFR2 is said to indicate a diagnosis of endometrial cancer or pre-cancer in the woman. This patent application is a continuation of US patent application Ser. No. 15/088,099, filed 31 March 2016 (published as US20160209417), which is a continuation of US patent application Ser. No. 13/973,614, filed 22 August 2013 (published as US20140057261), which is a continuation-in-part of US patent application Ser. No. 12/532,563 filed 11 November 2009 (published as US20100111944), which is a US National Stage Application of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/058065 filed 24 March 2008, which claims priority to US Provisional Application No. 60/896,884, filed 23 March 2007 and US Provisional Application No. 60/982,093, filed 23 October 2007. Pollock P, Goodfellow P. 28 March 2019. US2019085083 (A1) KLRG1 signalling therapy. This patent application relates to the reported discovery that killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1) can function as a co-inhibitory receptor and could be a target for immunotherapy such as cancer immunotherapy. Specifically, the patent outlines the administration of an effective amount of a killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1)/ligand binding agent to disrupt KLRG1 signalling and activate CD8+ cytotoxic T and/or NK cells, which could be used to treat cancers including breast cancer, ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer. Greenberg S, Gulla SV, Thompson KE. 21 March 2019. The government of El Salvador has reportedly recently commuted the prison sentences of three women who had previously been imprisoned after experiencing obstetric emergencies. Women in El Salvador who experience pregnancy-related emergencies such as miscarriage can be accused by the authorities of having an abortion and be imprisoned on charges of aggravated homicide. Source: www.reproductiverights.org The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recently ruled that an Italian in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic had violated a woman's human rights as a result of the country's fertility laws, which led to an enforced pregnancy. The woman tried to withdraw consent to an embryo transfer during IVF treatment (as a result of the embryo being graded ‘average quality’ and therefore at greater risk of a miscarriage) but law 40/2004, which regulates assisted reproductive technologies, reportedly states that consent can only be withdrawn before fertilisation has occurred and the clinic threatened to sue her if she refused to go ahead with the transfer. Source: www.bionews.org.uk Clinicians keen to keep up-to-date regarding clinical studies that are currently recruiting may find the following informative.